Japanese Magazine Mina Magazine Review: Magazine Snidel

Mina June 2011 X Snidel Multi Case

Picked up Mina June 2011 issue today at Kinokuniya KLCC. This issue comes with Snidel multi case which is something that I was looking forward to all this while. I placed my reservation a month ago when I found out about this issue.

Mina June 2011 X Snidel Multi Case cost me RM40.65 after Isetan member 5% discount. Original price is RM42.80.

As this is the 10th Anniversary Year issue, this is a double cover edition!

Supplement blurp on magazine front cover. I’m still liking their nicely done huge blurp.

The supplement packaging remain the same like any other magazine supplement.

But. . .one thing is missing though. The multi case is not wrap with a plastic bag before placing into the cardboard box.

The multi case is made from gorgeous peach colour polyester with polka dots. However I’m a lil disappointed that the case is not properly align before sewing making the design of the polka dots tilted to one side.
Compared with the previous Tsumori Chisato Multi Case that I bought, this is much more thinner material without padding inside unlike Tsumori Chisato one.

Once again, the brand label is also not properly align before sewing!! *slap forehead*

I don’t like to see the zipper end sticking out like that. It looks ugly. I tried sticking it inside but I have difficulties zipping the case. How? I never had this problem with Tsumori Chisato multi case.

The weirdest thing which I don’t understand is although the case is in peach colour, the zip is in mint green or light green colour. Weird right?

Here is the inside view. I love the compartment of this case though! I don’t get this many slots in Tsumori Chisato multi case but I’m glad this is different. This is the main reason why I got it.

I’m not so into japanese magazine anymore though. I can’t clarify why. My only guess is I’m tired with the same freebies i.e. tote bag, cosmetic case, mirror, canvas bag, small bag.



Comments (2)

  • Girl yours is ok la! My Jill Stuart one is horrible! Both surfaces are horrible and creased!

    Reply
  • Yea I saw it. The double printing was horrible ler

    Reply

Write a comment